If you still have questions about the true nature of the relationship between Bill Ayers, the Weather Underground and Barack Obama, watch the 2 videos and read the folowing posts:
How come Obama never "confesses" the true extent of himself and Ayers? This is why:
Ayers was responsible for "giving" Obama a pretigious position, that would be used later on his political resume; A position for which Obama was not qualified. Obama then gave Ayers a "rave review" on his book. The two working in tandum together to gain social and political influence, one can only surmise, to further their 'socialist' cause. So how did is come to this? Read this report, and kudos on some great sleuthing!
http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=64
"Obama’s review of Ayers’ book says, “A searing and timely account of the juvenile court system, and the courageous individuals who rescue hope from despair.”
I had seen mentions of the existence of this review in a very few media outlets, including CNN, National Review, American Spectator, and a handful of others. But because the review was published before the Chicago Tribune began digitizing and archiving its articles online, there was no direct Web link to the review itself — only citations of it. So, out of curiosity, I took it upon myself to visit a library in San Francisco, and using the library’s Lexis-Nexis access and its archive of microfilm versions of major newspapers, including the Chicago Tribune, I finally tracked down a copy of the actual review itself.
Turns out the review was very short — what I had thought (from reading the citations in the online articles) were just short quotes from it was in fact the entirety of the review. But it was accompanied by a photo of Obama, standing by his statement. The review was part of a column called “Mark My Word,” in which Chicago notables praise their favorite current books.
Just a few weeks before this review was published in the Chicago Tribune, Obama and Ayers appeared together on a panel about juvenile justice organized by Michelle Obama on November 20, 1997.
I find it very hard — no, make that impossible — to believe that Barack Obama had “no idea” who William Ayers really was, or that he had a past as a notorious domestic terrorist (as Obama’s campaign has claimed) while serving on panels with Ayers and simultaneously praising Ayers’ book in a major newspaper."
"On page 82 of the book itself, Ayers mentions Obama. So there’s no question they knew each other."
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/19/oh-these-are-the-people-in-your-neighborhood/
Now, don't tell me Barack Obama is the man you want for President of the United States!! With his background and past associations, he would not even clear a background check if he were applying for a position in the FBI. Unfortunately, Obama is a wily guy. He knows that if you GET ELECTED into office, you AUTOMATICALLY GET SECURITY CLEARANCE. Scary huh? And in their hungry need to feel inspired, Obama supporters follow blindly, not quite able to elucidate to where their inspiration will lead them.
Philip J Berg provided an update regarding the COLB of Barack Obama on his website on Friday, September 19, 2008. A subsequent comment by Mr. Berg’s assistant provides information from the FBI regarding the requirements for proof of citizenship. Here are the comments:
Obama, an educated Lawyer, should have been proactive early
and established his credentials. He is obviously hiding something.”
“written by Berg’s Assistant, September 19, 2008
We have received a lot of question asking “How did Obama get this far, he must have had background checks as he is a U.S. Senator.”
However, this is inaccurate according to Special Agent-in-Charge: C. Frank Figliuzzi of the Cleveland FBI. Background checks are not performed on those elected, once elected they work for Congress and are handed a secret clearance. See below:
This is a conversation between the Special Agent-in-Charge: C. Frank Figliuzzi of the Cleveland FBI and Mike Trivisonno on the Mike Trivisonno Show, WTAM 1100, 7/02/08, Hr. 2.
Caller - Do they perform background checks on candidates and fellows who are in Congress and the Senate and perhaps potential presidential candidates?.
FBI - The short answer is no, no we don’t, but they’re given top secret clearances because they’re members of Congress, or Senators, or even higher ranking officials.
Host - Time out. There are no background checks from the FBI on the people that lead the country, the United States of America?.
FBI - Let me emphasize, elected officials. This is a democracy, the people have elected an official to represent them in Washington, and we do not routinely run background checks on those people.
Host - Even people running for president of the United States of America?.
FBI - That’s correct.
Host - That’s a little weird
FBI - Well, its part of democracy, its part of what the American people want, they want to be able to vote for somebody to represent them in Washington and they don’t want us to get in the way of that and we have no predilection to get in the way of that.
Host - Yeah, but what if they’re voting for a bad person and they don’t know that person is bad, do you follow me?. I’m saying, if the guy’s got a background and maybe he’s involved with some people that he shouldn’t be involved with, shouldn’t we know that as voters?.
FBI - Well, I think you’d agree that the American political process is about as rigorous as you’ll ever see and if there’s dirt back there, probably the opponent is gonna get it out probably before anyone else will.
"Now isn’t that an interesting little tidbit? Nobody does background checks or vetting in an official capacity on elected officials, even candidates for President of the United States!
They figure it’s the discretion of the voters and that political campaigns will expose and vet candidates potential problems. In other words the people voted for them it’s up to them to make sure of who and what they really are.
So all the people out there saying the Birth Certificate thing is a non issue because he would have been checked out before running I guess that’s not the case at all. I suppose next they will “justify” why Obama should not have to show proof that he’s eligible for the job.
McCain faced similar questions and had at least the consideration for his supporters, the country and his own reputation to show proof and put the matter to rest. Will Obama do the same? Or will he continue to show us the fake COLB on his website even though it’s been examined and shown to be a forgery. Yet another crime that is going unpunished and “justified”!"
It all comes back to integrity of character. Can we trust Barack Obama? He said we would take public financing for his campaign, and he broke his word. He said Ayers was just a man who “lived in his neighborhood, he was not forthcoming. He said it a good idea to essentially take money from the working man and “spread the wealth around”, he… well, I suppose that is ONE promise he intends to fulfill. So the question is, can we trust Barack Obama?
I think clearly, the answer is a resounding, "NO!"
No comments:
Post a Comment