Sunday, November 16, 2008

Thomas Sowell on Affirmative Action

  • The importance of empirical evidence, not only in a narrow technical sense but as reflected in the broad record of history.
  • The competing basic visions of policy makers, and their role in the interactions of elites versus the ordinary masses.
  • An importance of trade-offs, constraints and incentives in human decision making.
  • The significance of human capital—attitudes, skills, and work.
  • The importance of systemic (orderly, structured) processes for decision-making—from free markets to the rule of law.

More on Thomas Sowell
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell

Recommended Readinghttp://vulcanhammer.blogspot.com/

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Premium Domain Names for Sale:

asianwetbox.com
barackopolis.com
barackopolis.net
educationgeneration.com
flickshtick.com
givemejoesmoney.com
iraqendgame.com
iwantjoesmoney.com
lookatberlin.com
looktoberlin.com
nbaoscars.com
nfloscars.com
nothingunderwear.net
nothingunderwear.com
obamopoly.com
pnkmarket.com
reincarlinated.com
shimmertrees.com
shimmertrees.net
slowjoebiden.com
stiruptheblog.com
stiruptheblog.net
twazzervision.com
victoryrepublicans.com
victoryrepublicans.net
whiteknucklemarket.com

Contact Jason

jason@headlinerkaps.com

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Obama wins Presidency! Hooray!

We've got him RIGHT where we want him. Now the REAL fight begins...

Yes, Barack Obama will become our 44th president. And as evidence of my undying optimism and devotion to the Spirit of America, I thought I would lay out the “bright side” of an Obama presidency:

1. When I saw the final tally, one of my first thoughts was, "Well, lets look at the bright side. The misdirected label of the US being a racist nation has been permanently removed. Nice job Obama." But will it? Did those blacks and minorities who felt themselves ‘suppressed by The Man’ instantly shed their victim self-image? Will they really retract their claws and embrace the white man as an equal brother without malice or resentment?  We'll have to wait and see.

2. This election has been intense. It has inspired and motivated previously dormant minds to engage in our electoral process. Young and old people alike felt motivated to take part this year and "make a difference". But just what kind of difference have they made? I only hope that after 4 years, this new political force will wake up to how socialistic Obama’s mindset truly is. And perhaps a large percentage of them will migrate to the conservative side, solidifying the base for 2012!

3.  I think its a great idea that the House, the Senate, and the Presidency will all be run by the Dems.  It will give them the opportunity to drive the car for a while.  Perhaps they will learn (hopefully at the least cost possible) how bad some of their beliefs and policies are.  Don't worry folks, we'll all get through this together.

I guess thats it for now.  If you need me, I'll be around; monitoring govwatch for the barrage of BAD BILLS that will be slithering down the steps of Congress and the Senate!  Look for my sign!

Friday, October 31, 2008

Obama's Aunt Just Popped Up!

... and she is here illegally?

WASHINGTON - The Associated Press has learned that Barack Obama's aunt, a Kenyan woman who has been quietly living in public housing in Boston, is in the United States illegally after an immigration judge rejected her request for asylum four years ago.  However, she recently made a $260 campaign contribution to her nephew's presidential bid from a work address in the city. A contribution to the Obama campaign would indicate that she is a US citizen. And if she is not, it is illegal to contribute.

She declined to answer most other questions about her relationship with the presidential contender until after the November 4 election. “I can’t talk about it, I just pray for him, that’s all,” she said, adding: “After the 4th, I can talk to anyone.”

Obama loves to preach to others about being their brother's keeper. Yet, his beloved aunt is living in a Boston slum, and his half-brother lives in a hut in Africa. I guess it's okay for Obama to spread the wealth around, as long as it's not his.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article5042571.ece

Obama Supports Elective Abortion

Sean Hannity report puts Obama's support of Planned Parenthood in perspective.


Fred Says It All

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

An inspiring Letter from Cory The Well Driller

[A letter from Cory The Well Driller to Presidential Candidate Barack Obama.  This guy sounds like a GO-GETTER of the American dream, not a social leech who feels entitled to another American's hard work.  And I bed he's never missed a depth he's aimed for!]

Mr. Obama,

Given the uproar about the simple question asked you by Joe the plumber, and the persecution that has been heaped on him because he dared to question you, I find myself motivated to say a few things to you myself. While Joe aspires to start a business someday, I already have started not one, but 4 businesses. But first, let me introduce myself. You can call me 'Cory the well driller'. I am a 54 year old high school graduate. I didn't go to college like you, I was too ready to go 'conquer the world' when I finished high school. 25 years ago at age 29, I started my own water well drilling business at a time when the economy here in East Texas was in a tailspin from the crash of the early 80's oil boom. I didn't get any help from the government, nor did I look for any. I borrowed what I could from my sister, my uncle, and even the pawn shop and managed to scrape together a homemade drill rig and a few tools to do my first job. My businesses did not start as a result of privilege. They are the result of my personal drive, personal ambition, self discipline, self reliance, and a determination to treat my customers fairly. From the very start my business provided one other (than myself) East Texan a full time job. I couldn't afford a backhoe the first few years (something every well drilling business had), so I and my helper had to dig the mud pits that are necessary for each and every job with hand shovels. I had to use my 10 year old, 1/2 ton pickup truck for my water tank truck (normally a job for at least a 2 ton truck).

A year and a half after I started the business, I scraped together a 20% down payment to get a modest bank loan and bought a (28 year) old, worn out, slightly bigger drilling rig to allow me to drill the deeper water wells in my area. I spent the next few years drilling wells with the rig while simultaneously rebuilding it between jobs. Through these years I never knew from one month to the next if I would have any work or be able to pay the bills. I got behind on my income taxes one year, and spent the next two years paying that back (with penalty and interest) while keeping up with ongoing taxes. I got behind on my water well supply bill 2 different years (way behind the second time... $80,000.00), and spent over a year paying it back (each time) while continuing to pay for ongoing supplies C.O.D. Of course, the personal stress endured through these experiences and years is hard to measure. I do have a stent in my heart now to memorialize it all.

I spent the next 10 years developing the reputation for being the most competent and most honest water well driller in East Texas . 2 years along the way, I hired another full time employee for the drilling business so that we could provide full time water well pump service as well as the well drilling. Also, 3 years along the path, I bought a water well screen service machine from a friend, starting business # 2. 5 years later I made a business loan for $100,000.00 to build a new, higher production, computer controlled screen service machine. I had designed the machine myself, and it didn't work out for 3 years so I had to make the loan payments without the benefit of any added income from the new machine. No government program was there to help me with the payments, or to help me sleep at night as I lay awake wondering how I would solve my machine problems or pay my bills. Finally, after 3 years, I got the screen machine working properly, and that provided another full time job for an East Texan in the screen service business.

2 years after that, I made another business loan, this time for $250,000.00, to buy another used drilling rig and all the support equipment needed to run another, larger, drill rig. This provided another 2 full time jobs for East Texans. Again, I spent a couple of years not knowing if I had made a smart move, or a move that would bankrupt me. For the third time in 13 years, I had placed everything I owned on the line, risking everything, in order to build a business.

A couple of years into this, I came up with a bright idea for a new kind of mud pump, a fundamentally necessary pump used on water well drill rigs. I spent my entire life savings to date (just $30,000), building a prototype of the pump and took it to the national water well convention to show it off. Customers immediately started coming out of the woodworks to buy the pumps, but there was a problem. I had depleted my assets making the prototype, and nobody would make me a business loan to start production of the new pumps. With several deposits for pump orders in hand, and nowhere to go, I finally started applying for as many credit cards as I could find and took cash withdrawals on these cards to the tune of over $150,000.00 (including modest loans from my dear sister and brother), to get this 3rd business going. 

Yes, once again, I had everything hanging over the line in an effort to start another business. I had never manufactured anything, and I had to design and bring into production a complex hydraulic machine from an untested prototype to a reliable production model (in six months). How many nights I lay awake wondering if I had just made the paramount mistake of my life I cannot tell you, but there were plenty. I managed to get the pumps into production, which immediately created another 2 full time jobs in East Texas . Some of the models in the first year suffered from quality issues due to the poor workmanship of one of my key suppliers, so I and an employee (another East Texan employed) had to drive across the country to repair customers' pumps, practically from coast to coast. I stood behind the product, and made payments to all the credit cards that had financed me (and my brother and sister). I spent the next 5 years improving and refining the product, building a reputation for the pump and the company, working to get the pump into drill rig manufacturers' product lines, and paying back credit cards. During all this time I continued to manage a growing water well business that was now operating 3 drill rig crews, and 2 well service crews. Also, the screen service business continued to grow. No government programs were there to help me, Mr. Obama, but that's ok, I didn't expect any, nor did I want any. I was too busy fighting to make success happen to sit around waiting for the government to help me. 

Now, we have been manufacturing the mud pumps for 7 years, my combined businesses employ 32 full time employees, and distribute $5,000,000.00 annually through the local economy. Now, just 4 months ago I borrowed $1,254,000.00, purchasing computer controlled machining equipment to start my 4th business, a production machine shop. The machine shop will serve the mud pump company so that we can better manufacture our pumps that are being shipped worldwide. Of course, the machine shop will also do work for outside companies as well. This has already produced 2 more full time jobs, and 2 more should develop out of it in the next few months. This should work out, but if it doesn't it will be because you, and the other professional politicians like yourself, will have destroyed our country’s’ (and the world) economy with your meddling with mortgage loan programs through your liberal manipulation and intimidation of loaning institutions to make sure that unqualified borrowers could get mortgages. You see, at the very time when I couldn't get a business loan to get my mud pumps into production, you were working with Acorn and the Community Reinvestment Act programs to make sure that unqualified borrowers could buy homes with no down payment, and even no credit or worse yet, bad credit. Even the infamous, liberal, Ninja loans (No Income, No Job or Assets). While these unqualified borrowers were enjoying unrealistically low interest rates, I was paying 22% to 24% interest on the credit cards that I had used to provide me the funds for the mud pump business that has created jobs for more East Texans. It's funny, because after 25 years of turning almost every dime of extra money back into my businesses to grow them, it has been only in the last two years that I have finally made enough money to be able to put a little away for retirement, and now the value of that has dropped 40% because of the policies you and your ilk have perpetrated on our country. 

You see, Mr. Obama, I'm the guy you intend to raise taxes on. I'm the guy who has spent 25 years toiling and sweating, fretting and fighting, stressing and risking, to build a business and get ahead. I'm the guy who has been on the very edge of bankruptcy more than a dozen times over the last 25 years, and all the while creating more and more jobs for East Texans who didn’t want to take a risk, and would not demand from themselves what I have demanded from myself. I'm the guy you characterize as 'the Americans who can afford it the most' that you believe should be taxed more to provide income redistribution 'to spread the wealth' to those who have never toiled, sweated, fretted, fought, stressed, or risked anything. You want to characterize me as someone who has enjoyed a life of privilege and who needs to pay a higher percentage of my income than those who have bought into your entitlement culture. 

I resent you, Mr. Obama, as I resent all who want to use class warfare as a tool to advance their political career. What's worse, each year more Americans buy into your liberal entitlement culture, and turn to the government for their hope of a better life instead of themselves. Liberals are succeeding through more than 40 years of collaborative effort between the predominant liberal media, and liberal indoctrination programs in the public school systems across our land.

What is so terribly sad about this is this, America was made great by people who embraced the one-time American culture of self reliance, self motivation, self determination, self discipline, personal betterment, hard work, risk taking. A culture built around the concept that success was in reach of every able bodied American who would strive for it. Each year that less Americans embrace that culture, we all descend together. We descend down the socialist path that has brought country after country ultimately to bitter and unremarkable states. If you and your liberal comrades in the media and school systems would spend just half as much effort cultivating a culture of can-do across America as you do cultivating your entitlement culture, we could see Americans at large embracing the conviction that they can elevate themselves through personal betterment, personal achievement, and self reliance. 

You see, when people embrace such ideals, they act on them. When people act on such ideals, they succeed. All of America could find herself elevating instead of deteriorating. But that would eliminate the need for liberal politicians, wouldn't it, Mr. Obama? The country would not need you if the country was convinced that problem solving was best left with individuals instead of the government. You and all your liberal comrades have got a vested interested in creating a dependent class in our country. It is the very business of liberals to create an ever expanding dependence on government. 

What's remarkable is that you, who have never produced a job in your life, are going to tax me to take more of my money and give it to people who wouldn't need my money if they would get off their entitlement mentality asses and apply themselves at work, demand more from themselves, and quit looking to liberal politicians to raise their station in life. You see, I know because I've had them work for me before. Hundreds of them over these 25 years. People who simply will not show up to work on time. People who just will not work 5 days in a week, much less, 6 days. People always looking for a way to put less effort out. People who actually tell me that they would do more if I just would first pay them more. People who take off work to sit in government offices to apply to get free government handouts (gee, I wonder how things would have turned out for them if they had spent that time earning money and pleasing their employer?). You see, all of this comes from your entitlement mentality culture.

Oh, I know you will say I am uncompassionate. Sorry, Mr. Obama, wrong again. You see, I've seen what the average percentage of your income has been given to charities over the years of 2000 to 2004 (ignoring the years you started running for office - can you pronounce “politically motivated”), you averaged less than 1% annually. And your running mate, Joe Biden, averaged less than ¼% of his annual income in charitable contributions over the last 10 years. Like so many liberals, the two of you want to give to the needy, just as long as it is someone else’s money you are giving to them. I won’t say what I have given to charities over the last 25 years, but the percentage is several times more than you and Joe Biden… combined (don’t you just hate google?). Tell me again how you feel my pain.

In short, Mr. Obama, your political philosophies represent everything that is wrong with our country. You represent the culture of government dependence instead of self reliance, entitlement mentality instead of personal achievement; Penalization of the successful to reward the unmotivated; Political correctness instead of open mindedness and open debate. If you are successful, you may preside over the final transformation of America from being the greatest and most self-reliant culture on earth, to just another country of whiners and wimps, who sit around looking to the government to solve their problems. Like all of western Europe. All countries on the decline. All countries that, because of liberal socialistic mentalities, have a little less to offer mankind every year.

God help us... 

Cory Miller 

Just a ordinary, extraordinary American, the way a lot of Americans used to be. 

P.S. Yes, Mr. Obama, I am a real American... www.cmillerdrilling.com

Monday, October 27, 2008

Wake-Up Call... you are on ON THE AIR!

Okay, NOW tell me Barack Obama is not a Socialist!  The "redistribution of wealth" (of others) is a tennant of Socialism, and he has this conversation ON THE RADIO, not weather it is right, wrong or constituional, but on how best to do it.  This recording is only from 2001.  

I know many people vote their "guts" and by "feeling".  Or perhaps you vote based on the fact that Obama is black, and it is high time.  Or maybe this recording you just heard goes "over your head" and you just vote for any Democrat.  Well, just remember who you voted for, and why.  You may have voted to give the steering wheel of our nation to a charismatic, articulate, smooth and influencial Marxist.  Someone of which Karl himself would be proud.  And if you haven't already voted, consider this; We are all born equal, into an inhumane world, and it is our choices that determines our place in it.  But if we blindly give up our freedom to choose, we will soon see we give up our humanity as well. 

[Marx argued that socioeconomic change occurred through organized revolutionary action. On this model, capitalism will end through the organized actions of an international working class, led by a Communist Party: "Communism is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established, an ideal to which reality [will] have to adjust itself. We call communism the real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence."]

Monday, October 20, 2008

Obama - in his OWN WORDS...

If you still have questions about the true nature of the relationship between Bill Ayers, the Weather Underground and Barack Obama, watch the 2 videos and read the folowing posts:

How come Obama never "confesses" the true extent of himself and Ayers?  This is why:

Ayers was responsible for "giving" Obama a pretigious position, that would be used later on his political resume; A position for which Obama was not qualified.  Obama then gave Ayers a "rave review" on his book.  The two working in tandum together to gain social and political influence, one can only surmise, to further their 'socialist' cause.  So how did is come to this?  Read this report, and kudos on some great sleuthing!

http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=64

"Obama’s review of Ayers’ book says, “A searing and timely account of the juvenile court system, and the courageous individuals who rescue hope from despair.”

I had seen mentions of the existence of this review in a very few media outlets, including CNN, National Review, American Spectator, and a handful of others. But because the review was published before the Chicago Tribune began digitizing and archiving its articles online, there was no direct Web link to the review itself — only citations of it. So, out of curiosity, I took it upon myself to visit a library in San Francisco, and using the library’s Lexis-Nexis access and its archive of microfilm versions of major newspapers, including the Chicago Tribune, I finally tracked down a copy of the actual review itself.

Turns out the review was very short — what I had thought (from reading the citations in the online articles) were just short quotes from it was in fact the entirety of the review. But it was accompanied by a photo of Obama, standing by his statement. The review was part of a column called “Mark My Word,” in which Chicago notables praise their favorite current books.

Just a few weeks before this review was published in the Chicago Tribune, Obama and Ayers appeared together on a panel about juvenile justice organized by Michelle Obama on November 20, 1997.

I find it very hard — no, make that impossible — to believe that Barack Obama had “no idea” who William Ayers really was, or that he had a past as a notorious domestic terrorist (as Obama’s campaign has claimed) while serving on panels with Ayers and simultaneously praising Ayers’ book in a major newspaper."

"On page 82 of the book itself, Ayers mentions Obama. So there’s no question they knew each other."

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/19/oh-these-are-the-people-in-your-neighborhood/

Now, don't tell me Barack Obama is the man you want for President of the United States!! With his background and past associations, he would not even clear a background check if he were applying for a position in the FBI. Unfortunately, Obama is a wily guy. He knows that if you GET ELECTED into office, you AUTOMATICALLY GET SECURITY CLEARANCE. Scary huh? And in their hungry need to feel inspired, Obama supporters follow blindly, not quite able to elucidate to where their inspiration will lead them.

Philip J Berg provided an update regarding the COLB of Barack Obama on his website on Friday, September 19, 2008.  A subsequent comment by Mr. Berg’s assistant provides information from the FBI regarding the requirements for proof of citizenship. Here are the comments:

Obama, an educated Lawyer, should have been proactive early
and established his credentials. He is obviously hiding something.”

“written by Berg’s Assistant, September 19, 2008


We have received a lot of question asking “How did Obama get this far, he must have had background checks as he is a U.S. Senator.”

However, this is inaccurate according to Special Agent-in-Charge: C. Frank Figliuzzi of the Cleveland FBI. Background checks are not performed on those elected, once elected they work for Congress and are handed a secret clearance. See below:

This is a conversation between the Special Agent-in-Charge: C. Frank Figliuzzi of the Cleveland FBI and Mike Trivisonno on the Mike Trivisonno Show, WTAM 1100, 7/02/08, Hr. 2.

Caller - Do they perform background checks on candidates and fellows who are in Congress and the Senate and perhaps potential presidential candidates?.

FBI - The short answer is no, no we don’t, but they’re given top secret clearances because they’re members of Congress, or Senators, or even higher ranking officials.

Host - Time out. There are no background checks from the FBI on the people that lead the country, the United States of America?.

FBI - Let me emphasize, elected officials. This is a democracy, the people have elected an official to represent them in Washington, and we do not routinely run background checks on those people.

Host - Even people running for president of the United States of America?.

FBI - That’s correct.

Host - That’s a little weird

FBI - Well, its part of democracy, its part of what the American people want, they want to be able to vote for somebody to represent them in Washington and they don’t want us to get in the way of that and we have no predilection to get in the way of that. 

Host - Yeah, but what if they’re voting for a bad person and they don’t know that person is bad, do you follow me?. I’m saying, if the guy’s got a background and maybe he’s involved with some people that he shouldn’t be involved with, shouldn’t we know that as voters?.

FBI - Well, I think you’d agree that the American political process is about as rigorous as you’ll ever see and if there’s dirt back there, probably the opponent is gonna get it out probably before anyone else will.

"Now isn’t that an interesting little tidbit? Nobody does background checks or vetting in an official capacity on elected officials, even candidates for President of the United States!

They figure it’s the discretion of the voters and that political campaigns will expose and vet candidates potential problems. In other words the people voted for them it’s up to them to make sure of who and what they really are.

So all the people out there saying the Birth Certificate thing is a non issue because he would have been checked out before running I guess that’s not the case at all. I suppose next they will “justify” why Obama should not have to show proof that he’s eligible for the job.

McCain faced similar questions and had at least the consideration for his supporters, the country and his own reputation to show proof and put the matter to rest. Will Obama do the same? Or will he continue to show us the fake COLB on his website even though it’s been examined and shown to be a forgery. Yet another crime that is going unpunished and “justified”!"

It all comes back to integrity of character. Can we trust Barack Obama? He said we would take public financing for his campaign, and he broke his word. He said Ayers was just a man who “lived in his neighborhood, he was not forthcoming. He said it a good idea to essentially take money from the working man and “spread the wealth around”, he… well, I suppose that is ONE promise he intends to fulfill.  So the question is, can we trust Barack Obama?

I think clearly, the answer is a resounding, "NO!"



Friday, October 17, 2008

Obama: The Oak Grown from Acorn

"Last week, well before news broke today of an FBI voter-fraud investigation of the Association of Community Organizers for Reform Now (Acorn), Nevada authorities raided the group’s Las Vegas headquarters. The offices of Nevada’s secretary of state and attorney general, both Democrats, seized computers, voter-registration cards, and employee information after Acorn submitted numerous fraudulent names and addresses as part of its voter-registration drive. “Some of these [forms] were facially fraudulent; we basically had the starting lineup for the Dallas Cowboys,” Ross Miller, Nevada’s secretary of state, explained. “Tony Romo is not registered to vote in Nevada.”

"In the mid-nineties, Barack Obama ran Acorn’s Project Vote campaign in Illinois. He sued the state of Illinois on the group’s behalf in 1995 to implement the Motor Voter law. “After he joined the board of the Woods Fund,” Stealing Elections notes, “Obama saw to it that substantial grants were given to Acorn.” Senator Obama has championed Acorn’s legislative priorities in Congress. His presidential campaign even donated more than $800,000 to Acorn. Obama is the oak grown from Acorn, a group so proud of its association that it boasts “Obama Organizing Fellows” and runs a “Camp Obama” training event. While Acorn boasts of its Obama association, the candidate, of course, is more reticent. That’s because he well knows that many non-dead, non-animal voters would not find a close association with such a group a desirable quality in a potential president."

“Once a community organizer, then a foundation grant-maker, and now a lobbyist for direct government funding, Barack Obama has been with Acorn throughout his career,” Fund writes. “In return, Acorn is pledging to spend $35 million this year registering voters—both real and fictive. Should Obama become president, look for Acorn to have a vastly more ambitious legislative agenda, and for Obama to be responsive.” Acorn, in other words, has a lot riding on Tony Romo voting early, often, and everywhere."

http://www.city-journal.org/2008/bc1016df.html

Friday, October 10, 2008

McCain is a decent human being....

... perhaps too decent to be President?



I've heard it said before by one of my Intellectual Fathers, Dennis Prager, "There are two types of people in the world, the decent and the indecent." Though, he was quoting his friend Victor Frankl, I learned it from Dennis. Dennis also taught me that sometimes you must confront violent evil with violent good. And although Barack Obama may not fall on the "evil" side, he would unwittingly breed an environment for evil to flourish. And violence is out of the equation, so what to do? John McCain carries with him an old-fashioned, compassionate, conservative, goodness-centered nature. I love him for that. Perhaps his compassion is also his greatest weakness, because it precludes him resorting to the necessary underhanded tactics to win favor in a political race. He is mindful of his position and who he represents. For John McCain, this race is not about ego, it is not about winning “at any cost”, especially the cost of his integrity and that of the office. Obama, on the other hand, is all ego. He is more personality, than substance. He is more driven to make a difference, than to serve a cause. 

Perhaps a more effective tactic for McCain's campaign from the beginning would have been, not to treat Obama as an equal, but as an underling. Isn’t that the perception of McCain’s greatest liability, his age? To use this perception as his strength could have congealed this election for him earlier on. Like in Lord of the Rings, everyone loves Gandalf! He should have related to Obama as an inexperienced naïve youngster requiring the tempered hand experience of the wise sage-like father. Instead, he put him on even footing and has given up his staff. And now, alas, the hour is late; and the shadows grow long. It seems the white-hair wizard has fallen to The Dark One. But is this movie really over yet? As I recall, Gandalf always comes riding up at the very last moment to save the day. And through it all he keeps his integrity, his decency. We shall see if it comes to that end.

Hailing John McCain!, "Do not go quietly into that good night!"

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Obama Becomes More UNclear about his Ties To Socialist Radicals

Ever since he made the scene, I knew there was something fishy about Barack Obama. Then I find out his alignment with Radical Socialist people and groups in this country and how he got his start into politics.  It seems to me, he is a smooth talker but a dirty-walker. (To bite from a MadTV skit) He speaks with that beautiful robust voice, those powerfully cadenced sentences, and says exactly what all people want to hear. That we want a world with no poverty, with no violence, with no despair, and with no troubles. And the fact that he is of minority racial decent, only add to his appeal for the well-meaning or rather "guilt ridden" majority of this country, who find that part of our history so shameful. Of course everyone gets impressed with well-spoken platitudes; Ideas like Hope, Change, and Fairness.  It appeals to the human psyche. He sounds like a preacher. Only, he's not a preacher. He sounds like he has got it all worked out. Only, he hasn't got it all worked out. He sounds like an American patriot. Only... well, YOU be the judge.

On his political alignment with unrepentant domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, Obama again announces his desire to be "absolutely clear" and says nothing.   ReadThis

"Why don't we just clear it up right now," Obama told ABC News' Charlie Gibson in an exclusive interview for World News. "I'll repeat again what I've said many times. This is a guy who engaged in some despicable acts 40 years ago when I was eight years old. By the time I met him, 10 or 15 years ago, he was a college professor of education at the University of Illinois . . . And the notion that somehow he has been involved in my campaign, that he is an adviser of mine, that . . . I've 'palled around with a terrorist', all these statements are made simply to try to score cheap political points."

Why can't he deny his association and alignment to America Haters like Bill Ayers and Rev Wright? Why can’t he just say he disagrees with Bill Ayers political position and he was wrong to remain on a board with such a man? Because he can't. Because he is on the same team, that's why!  

Why also do the media protect, or turn a blind eye to this history?  I think it's because they, like so many others, have been swooned by this "One" with the silver tongue.  Not to mention that he is a huge reservior of news for years to come, if he becomes President.

Obama's attraction to the hard left in this country is not new, just well concealed.   This National Review Story reveals alot of Obama's historical journey toward the White House.  In his own book, Obama admits, he chooses his associations with great care.  Well, if these are the choices in friends and allys that he has carefully chosen, how can we expect better choices as our president?  By the way, I wonder how Barack Obama even got be a Senator, when his past associations would prevent him from a governent secuity job, muchless president of the United States??!!!  

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Obama <---> Ayers Relationship

The Speech John McCain Should Give

My friends, I am neither young nor eloquent, handsome nor smooth. But I have lived a long life, much of it in service to America in war and in peace. And I have always stood for straight talk. There has been no time in our nation's recent history when the American people more needed to hear the plain truth from their leaders. A fundamental reason our country faces economic catastrophe is that we have built our lives around running from truths about the American way of life.

Washington has run from the truth. Wall Street has run from the truth. And if we're honest with ourselves, all of us have, in one way or another, run from the truth.

We have accepted the lie that we can live exactly as we want to live, with no concern for the consequences. We have taken the blessings of liberty and prosperity and turned them into a curse of debt slavery - bondage that will be visited on our children, and our children's children, if we don't change.

Everybody has a theory about how we got into this mess, and it's usually one that absolves them and their party from blame. My friends, I'm here to tell you that this crisis is the Republicans' fault. It's the Democrats' fault. It's the fault of every one of us who believed in the fairy tale of a free lunch.

It's time for all Americans to take responsibility for what we've done. It's time for all Americans to pull together to help our families, our neighbors and our country through hard times.

I will not lie to you and tell you that the road ahead will be easy. I will not insult you by giving you simple villains, simple heroes or simplistic solutions. As the song says, everybody wants to get to heaven, but nobody wants to die. My fellow Americans, all of us must sacrifice to endure the trials that history sends our way and to rebuild our nation on a solid foundation of honor, truth and plainspoken virtue.

I know something about sacrifice. And I know something about the way life can break your pride. I was a cocky Navy aviator who thought he was invulnerable. Then I was shot out of the sky and spent five years in prison. That experience did not kill me. It made me stronger. It taught me how much I loved my God, my family and my country - and what trials I could endure for the sake of that love.

I am a patriot. I believe we are a nation of patriots, of men and women who are ready and willing to put country first. But over the years, our leaders, Republican and Democratic, have asked us to do little more than to go shopping, to vote for them and to blame other people for what's wrong with America. Anything to keep us from facing the truth and changing our ways.

As your president, I will ask you to do hard things. I, too, will do hard things for the good of this great nation. Serious times call for serious leadership. In his first speech as prime minister, with his free nation facing the might of Nazi Germany, Winston Churchill refused to mislead the British people about the gravity of their situation. We remember today his words to them: "I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat."

Churchill did not give cheap optimism. He, too, had fought and suffered for his nation, both on the battlefield and in Parliament. He had known the joy of victory and the humiliation of defeat. What Churchill, from his incomparable experience, could offer his people was the gold standard of hope. Hope is the conviction that whatever suffering we must go through, goodness and right shall prevail.

Today, when I survey the gathering storm, I am certain that if we, the people, stand together without fear or favor, victory will be ours. I ask you to give me the privilege of leading this great nation in a time when heroes will be made, and all good men and women must come to the aid of their country.

Thank you, and God bless America.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/10/the_speech_john_mccain_should.html
By Rod Dreher

WARNING! Busy Little Bees... with their backdoor amendments

What the heck is going on? I am livid right now. The passage of this Bail-Out Bill and subsequent market downturn is enough to get us all angry. But how many realize the newest Bill that was passed had over 100 billion dollars added to it along with some amendments UN-RELATED TO THE BAIL-OUT? I know this practice is ages old, but it is wrong; just as is bundling good loans with bad. I know they do it to garner votes. However, a good idea, a good law, should stand on its own.

There are so many additions in this 451 page monstrosity, I lost count. One provides tax credits for biodeisel and another extends depreciation rules for restaurant improvements. But the sneak attack I am focused on is the Mental Illness Insurance Coverage Amendment which, sounds like a good idea on it's face, but should have remained a separate Bill altogether. I find it reprehensible that supporters of this Bill would take advantage of a crucial time-sensitive decision like this Bail-Out Package, and use it to railroad the American people with a health care tax increase on top of it all.

Even Democrat Senator Russell Feingold said, "I strongly support some of the unrelated measures being added to the bailout package. ... But that legislation could have proceeded on its own, without being attached to the emergency bailout bill. "  And Feingold is even a rank-and-file Democrat!

The part that really worries me is the probability that people will exploit this package because it will be easier for people to obtain treatment for a wide range of conditions, including obscure conditions like depression, eating disorders and alcohol and drug abuse. I haven’t read who or what oversight committee will determine a conditions legitimacy. If it up to a simple pen scribble of your doctor, prepare for higher health insurance premiums for everyone. And if we are talking about covering any and all afflictions listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders of the American Psychiatric Association, you can expect claims for caffeine intoxication, sleep disorders resulting from jet lag, and obesity (overeating disorder). And according to Andrew Sperling, a lobbyist at the National Alliance on Mental Illness, an advocacy group, said, “[the new law] encourages insurers to integrate coverage for mental health care with medical and surgical benefits.” Which could be interpreted by some wily attorney to mean ‘free liposuction for 1/3 of the population’. I realize these are real problems. But most are self-correcting and a modifiable behavior most cases. It’s a slippery slope, one we have seen many times in the past. I sincerely pray this one doesn’t lead off a cliff.

Monday, October 6, 2008

A SPEECH BY OBAMA: Wrong Then; Wrong Now

AND NOW TO STIRUPTHEBLOG!

Some REAL history from The CongressionalRecords official journal of Congress's daily proceedings.  A speech from Barack Obama in 2007.  He was wrong then and he’s wrong now.  [I couldn't resist making some comments here and there]  ;-)


Senator Barack Obmama, Jan 18, 2007,  The United States Senate:

Mr. President, I would like to speak briefly on what is a roiling debate not only in the Senate but across the country and that is the President's policy with respect to Iraq. There are countless reasons the American people have lost confidence in the President's Iraq policy, but chief among them has been the administration's insistence on making promises and assurances about progress and victory that do not appear to be grounded in the reality of the facts. [What would he have Bush do, destroy the morality of the military by admitting mistakes publicly to give surge to the enemy? He did what a leader does, keep it on the down-low until you work it out, and have history judge the outcome.] We have been told we would be greeted as liberators. We have been promised the insurgency was in its last throes. We have been assured again and again that we are making progress and that the Iraqis would soon stand up so we could stand down and our brave sons and daughters could start coming home. We have been asked to wait, we have been asked to be patient, and we have been asked to give the President and the new Iraqi Government 6 more months and then 6 more months after that and then 6 more months after that.

Now, after the loss of more than 3,000 American lives, after spending almost $400 billion after Iraq has descended into civil war [which its backward tribal mentality has been engaged in for 3000 years. And in this age of ubiquitous information and borderless nations, all human beings need to be brought into 21st century.], we have been promised, once again, that the President's plan to escalate the war in Iraq will, this time, be well planned, well coordinated, and well supported by the Iraqi Government. This time, we didn't have to wait to find out that none of this seems to be the case [naïve, quitter, microwave dinner stamina]. Already, American military officials have told the New York Times that there is no clear chain of command between Iraqis and U.S. commanders and no real indication that the Iraqis even want such a partnership. Yesterday, Prime Minister al-Maliki, the person whom the President said had brought this plan to us, the man who is supposed to be our partner in chief for this new plan, told foreign journalists that if the United States would only give his Army better weapons and equipment, our soldiers could go home.

The President's decision to move forward with this escalation anyway, despite all evidence and military advice to the contrary, is the terrible consequence of the decision to give him the broad, open-ended authority to wage this war back in 2002. Over 4 years later [Rome wasn’t built in a day], we can't revisit that decision or reverse some of the tragic outcomes, but what we can do is make sure we provide the kind of oversight and constraints on the President this time that we failed to do the last time.

I cannot in good conscience support this escalation. It is a policy which has already been tried and a policy which has failed. Just this morning, I had veterans of the Iraq war [any commanders?] visit my office to explain to me that this surge concept is, in fact, no different from what we have repeatedly tried, but with 20,000 troops we will not in any imaginable way be able to accomplish any new progress.

The fact is that we have tried this road before. In the end, no amount of American forces can solve the political differences that lie at the heart of somebody else's civil war [right, but only by removing the malignant threat of terrorist groups through force can an environment of “hope” be established. For humanitarian efforts to come in Educate, Liberate, and Procreate the good people who are being victimized everyday. That’s how strong tolerant cultures are transformed from a hate-filled brainwashed one into one able to contribute to medicine, engineering, or just the human race in general with more than just a new kind of road-side bomb.] As the President's own military commanders have said, escalation only prevents the Iraqis from taking more responsibility for their own future. It is even eroding our efforts in the wider war on terror as some of the extra soldiers will come directly from Afghanistan where the Taliban has become resurgent.

The President has offered no evidence that more U.S. troops will be able to pressure Shias, Sunnis, and Kurds toward the necessary political settlement, and he has attached no consequences to his plan should the Iraqis fail to make progress [and if the US does as Obama suggests, these groups can all go back to their peaceful benevolent ways. There will be no more bloodshed or ethnic cleansing, and I am sure Usama Bin Laden, Abdelkarim Hussein Mohamed Al-Nasser, Ayman Al-Zawahiri, and Jamel Ahmed Mohammed Ali Al-Badawi will all go back to their old jobs of selling figs and used cars somewhere in Mosul]. In fact, just last week, when I repeatedly asked Secretary Rice what would happen if the Iraqi Government failed to meet the benchmarks the President has called for and says are an integral part of their rationale for escalation, she couldn't give me an answer. When I asked her if there were any circumstances whatsoever in which we would tell the Iraqis that their failure to make progress means the end of our military commitment, she could not give me an answer. This is simply not good enough. When you ask how many more months and how many more dollars and how many more lives it will take to end the policy that everyone now knows has not succeeded, "I don't know" isn't good enough. [and I suppose Obama “knows” the consequences for withdrawing without succeeding in Iraq?]

Over the past 4 years, we have given this administration every chance to get this right, and they have disappointed us many times. But ultimately it is our brave men and women in uniform and their families who bear the greatest burden for these mistakes. They have performed in an exemplary fashion. At no stage have they faltered in the mission that has been presented to them. [these brave men and women have chosen to give their lives to the cause of America, which is Liberty, In God We Trust, and Freedom of Choice (among others). How can he presume to speak about the their “burden”? It is THEIR CHOICE that enables us all to even HAVE a voice!]

Unfortunately, the strategy, the tactics, and the mission itself have been flawed. That is why Congress now has the duty to prevent even more mistakes and bring this war to a responsible end. That is why I plan to introduce legislation which I believe will stop the escalation of this war by placing a cap on the number of soldiers in Iraq [thus lowering the likelihood of the removal of the terrorists hold on Iraq]. I wish to emphasize that I am not unique in taking this approach. I know Senator Dodd has crafted similar legislation. Senator Clinton, I believe, yesterday indicated she shared similar views. The cap would not affect the money spent on the war or on our troops, but it would write into law that the number of U.S. forces in Iraq should not exceed the number that were there on January 10, 2007, the day the President announced his escalation policy.

This measure would stop the escalation of the war in Iraq, but it is my belief that simply opposing the surge is not good enough. [because if it works, the Democratic Party could find itself on the wrong end of the rope. Well, look at that, it did work!] If we truly believe the only solution in Iraq is a political one--and I fervently believe that--if we believe a phased redeployment of U.S. forces in Iraq is the best--perhaps only--leverage we have to force a settlement between the country's warring factions, then we should act on that. That is why the second part of my legislation is a plan for phased redeployment that I called for in a speech in Chicago 2 months ago. It is a responsible plan that protects American troops without causing Iraq to suddenly descend into chaos. The President must announce to the Iraqi people that, within 2 to 4 months, under this plan, U.S. policy will include a gradual and substantial reduction in U.S. forces. The President should then work with our military commanders to map out the best plan for such a redeployment and determine precise levels and dates.

Drawing down our troops in Iraq will put pressure on Iraqis to arrive at the political settlement that is needed and allow us to redeploy additional troops in Afghanistan and elsewhere in the region, as well as bring some back home. The forces redeployed elsewhere in the region could then help to prevent the conflict in Iraq from becoming a wider war, something that every international observer is beginning to worry about. It will also reassure our allies in the gulf. It will allow our troops to strike directly at al-Qaida wherever it may exist and demonstrate to international terrorist organizations that they have not driven us from the region [“no, you’ve only driven us from Iraq, so if you just wait it out in a cave somewhere, you can return when we’re gone”].

My plan would couple this phased redeployment with an enhanced effort to train Iraqi security forces and would expand the number of our personnel--especially special forces--who are deployed with Iraqis as unit advisers and would finally link continued economic aid in Iraq with the existence of tangible progress toward reducing sectarian violence and reaching a political settlement.

One final aspect of this plan that I believe is critical is it would call for the engagement by the United States of a regional conference with other countries that are involved in the Middle East--particularly our allies but including Syria and Iran--to find a solution to the war in Iraq. [is he kidding? Just what would top sponsors of organized terror bring to this table, yellow cake?] We have to realize that neither Iran nor Syria wants to see the security vacuum in Iraq filled with chaos, terrorism, refugees, and violence [from some OTHER gang, oh no, that’s Iran’s job!], as it could have a destabilizing effect throughout the entire region and within their own countries [yes, best to go back to business as usual.. they bomb stuff, the rest of the world report on it]. So as odious as the behavior of those regimes may be at times, it is important that we include them in a broader conversation about how we can stabilize Iraq. [This is the kind of naiveté that Obama dangerously reveals. Although he likes to speak like him, he’s no Martin Luther King Jr. MLK had a dream, but at least he lived in the REAL world. Obama’s dream is a world of fuzzy bunnies playing nicely with friendly jaguars, near a chocolate stream, with marshmallow pies. Wake up, how many embassies, tankers, planes and buildings do they have to blow up before the left gets it that we don’t live in this world… yet. Perhaps, someday. At least now, under this evil dictator Bush, something is being done in the direction of that dream. It aint pretty, but conflict never is. Persistence is the key to any successful endeavor.]

In closing, let me say this: I have been a consistent and strong opponent of this war. I have also tried to act responsibly in that opposition to ensure that, having made the decision to go into Iraq, we provide our troops, who perform valiantly, the support they need to complete their mission [which Obama will reissue if he becomes President.. resembling something like RETREAT!!]. I have also stated publicly that I think we have both strategic interests and humanitarian responsibilities in ensuring that Iraqi is as stable as possible under the circumstances. [I suppose “The One” would be willing stand guard there catching bullets with his teeth! As long as the job doesn't entail actually going to Iraq.]

Finally, I said publicly that it is my preference not to micromanage the Commander in Chief in the prosecution of war ["but if I must, I must".] Ultimately, I do not believe that is the ideal role for Congress to play [“but once I’m President…”]. But at a certain point, we have to draw a line [How about at Columbia University?  Yes, that should just about do it!]. At a certain point, the American people have to have some confidence that we are not simply going down this blind alley in perpetuity. [Up Next, Obama drafts his next bill; The Iraq War Tax Rebate Plan.  This is where every American gets a hefty government grant to spend on National Defense how he or she sees fit.  We could use the money to build a border fence, or sponsor an American soldier to fight for us, like some 'role playing proxy video game slash feed a hungry child program'. We could send him text messages as to what action to take next. Please! What does the average American know about perpetrating a war?!! Lets leave this to the experts.]

When it comes to the war in Iraq, the time for promises and assurances, for waiting and patience is over. [says Obama and the left, because if success happens on Bush’s watch, they’ll never snag the White House again!] Too many lives have been lost and too many billions have been spent for us to trust the President on another tried-and-failed policy, opposed by generals and experts, opposed by Democrats and Republicans, opposed by Americans and even the Iraqis themselves. It is time to change our policy. It is time to give Iraqis their country back [“time to resurrect Hussein and give him back his gas chambers and rape rooms.”] , and it is time to refocus America's effort on the wider struggle against terror yet to be won. [using US soil as our base of operations? Iraq IS the ideal stronghold for this wider struggle. Our soldiers have expressed time and time again “Just let us win this.” And they will, for the good of all free nations and of all people.]

Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-s20070118-13&person=400629

THE CASE FOR A STABLE IRAQ

http://www.newser.com/article/d93jdnb80/analysis-stable-iraq-could-transform-middle-east-power-balance.html

Analysis: Stable Iraq could transform Middle East power balance

By ROBERT H. REID | Associated Press | Oct 3, 08 9:54 PM CDT in World

As violence in Iraq recedes, neighboring states are pondering how to deal with an unwieldy country that could re-emerge as a key player along with Saudi Arabia and Iran in one of the world's most strategic regions.

The role of regional power broker may seem far-fetched for Iraq _ a devastated land best known for car bombs, death squads and suicide attackers.

Still, countries of the Middle East cannot ignore the potential role of a resurgent Iraq, a nation of 28 million people, bordering Iran to the east, Syria and Jordan to the west and sitting on one of the world's major pools of oil.

For those reasons, the United States cannot afford to lose focus on Iraq, which will remain a strategic and important country even after the last of the 140,000 American soldiers have gone home.

Clearly Iraq is a long way from re-establishing itself as a major force in the region. In a first step, however, representatives of 35 international oil companies are to meet this month with Iraq's oil minister in London to discuss improving Iraqi gas and oil fields. Fellow Arab countries are talking about upgrading their relations with Iraq.

Iraq is likely to play a significant role in America's Middle East policy for decades _ even as the Pentagon scales down military operations here and ramps them up in Afghanistan.

The Middle East has long confounded forecasters, and the rosy predictions from the Bush administration that Iraq would emerge as a beacon of Western-style democracy in the Arab world have been long discredited.

However unlikely it may seem today, a relatively stable Iraq would have all the cards necessary to emerge as a major player in the Persian Gulf, where Saudi Arabia and Iran are competing for leadership.

Those three countries account for most of the population and most of the oil in the Gulf, which has about 60 percent of the world's proven reserves.

How the three deal with one another will shape the Middle East for decades.

Iraq's vast oil reserves alone should guarantee the country a major regional role.

Current estimates put Iraq's proven oil reserves at 115 billion barrels. But many experts believe that figure could rise by another 70 billion to 80 billion barrels once better security allows for renewed exploration.

If those estimates prove accurate, Iraq would have the world's second-largest proven oil reserves behind Saudi Arabia and ahead of Iran.

As Iran and Saudi Arabia compete for influence in the region, each has a strong interest in using Iraq as leverage against the other.

Neither Iran nor Saudi Arabia can afford to have Iraq throw itself solidly behind the other. Each wants a stable Iraq _ but not one strong enough to threaten its neighbors as when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in 1990.

In competing for influence in Iraq, Iran would seem to have the advantage. Most of Iran's nearly 70 million people are Shiites, the Muslim sect that includes about 60 percent of Iraq's population.

Iran offered asylum to thousands of Iraqi Shiites who fled Saddam's Sunni-dominated regime. Many of them returned home to assume positions of power after the U.S.-led invasion of 2003.

Iran has also cultivated close ties with the Kurds, who along with the Shiites have dominated political life in Iraq since the fall of Saddam.

Despite those advantages, Iran faces major obstacles in building influence in a country with bitter memories of the eight-year Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s and a legacy of centuries of rivalry between Arabs and Persian Iran.

U.S. and Iraqi officials remain convinced Iran is financing and training Shiite extremists, although Tehran denies the allegation. Many Iraqis _ both Shiites and Sunnis _ view their Iranian neighbor with deep suspicion.

At the same time, Iran sees Washington's ties to Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and others in the Shiite religious parties as a potential threat.

Other Arab countries fear that Iraq will fall under Iranian domination once the Americans have gone.

Arab pessimists see a dark vision of a Middle East with Iranian clients ruling Iraq, Iranian-backed Hezbollah as the dominant political force in Lebanon and Tehran's Hamas clients running the Palestinian entity.

Nowhere are those fears stronger than in Saudi Arabia, whose geriatric leadership has faced problems in responding to the political changes in Iraq, its northern neighbor.

The Saudis and other Sunni-dominated Arab governments maintain close ties to the United States. But their natural allies in Iraq _ minority Sunnis _ were fighting the Americans for most of the U.S. occupation.

Other Arab governments found it difficult to support the Shiite leadership in Baghdad while Iraqi Sunnis and Shiites were slaughtering each other in the streets.

Sectarian fighting has eased, and thousands of Sunni insurgents turned against al-Qaida and joined forces with the Americans.

Still, Arab governments have been slow to develop full diplomatic relations with Iraq, despite intense American pressure. Iraqis face enormous problems in seeking refuge elsewhere in the Arab world.

Many Iraqis resent the Arab attitude and fear that shunning them only enhances the influence of Iran, which embraced the new Iraqi government.

All these uncertainties will probably encourage Washington to pay close attention to Iraq for years.

"All Americans should be and are proud of the achievements in Iraq and the American role in bringing about the change," U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker said recently.

Losing interest in Iraq, he warned, risks paying "a major long-term price."


Sunday, October 5, 2008

OBAMA'S STRANGE BEDFELLOWS

You want to know why so many concerned citizens are so passionaltely supporting the McCain/Palin ticket, despite his "maverick streak, age, and temper"?  To say NOTHING for the kind of BILLS introduced by Barack Obama as US Senator (ZERO of which have any significance and ZERO of which even passed the Senate floor, since he was sworn in in 2005). If this video represents the kind of judgement and direction of leadership we can expect from Barack Obama as President,  we all have much to be concerned about.  Obama's past and present associations would preclude him from applying for a government job, muchless President! Although this is video has a light, mocking overtone, the information is real and credible.  I think we all deserve an explanation.  Clear your head and take a look.

Obama's - Words & Deeds

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/s_591517.html

In March, Barack Obama's speech in Philadelphia on race was inspiring and knowledgeable.

Attempting to put the Rev. Jeremiah Wright controversy behind him, Obama said he had "already condemned, in unequivocal terms," Wright's "inexcusable," "divisive," and "racially charged" comments.

Wright's "incendiary language," he said, expressed "views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation." Wright's criticisms of the United States, additionally, were based on "a profoundly distorted view of this country, a view that sees white racism as endemic and elevates what is wrong in America above all that we know is right with America."

The "offending sermons about America" by Wright, asserted Obama, were rooted in the past, in "a reality in which Rev. Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up," a generation that "came of age in the late fifties and early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and opportunity was systematically constricted."

It is this past that lives on in "the bitterness and bias" that make up the black experience in America, Obama explained, quoting William Faulkner: "The past isn't dead and buried. In fact, it isn't even passed."

Despair is the price of keeping this bitterness alive, the price of the endless preaching about past wrongs. The "legacy of defeat," said Obama, "was passed on to future generations, to those young men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future."

Unfortunately, to keep things from cooling down, to keep the money rolling their way, there's no shortage of hucksters who are willing and able to fan the flames of anger.

"At times, that anger," said Obama, "is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines" -- and to gin up the flow of money from the pews.

"That anger is not always productive," Obama asserted. "Indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition."

Why, then, given this call to reject "a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism," did Obama establish a long-lasting working relationship with unrepentant former terrorist William Ayers?

Obama dismissed inquiries about his relationship with Ayers, a founder of the Weather Underground, by saying that he was just "a guy who lives in my neighborhood."

In fact, Obama served from 1995 to 1999 as chairman of the board of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC), the brainchild of Ayers, an organization that funneled some $100 million into the hands of community organizers and activists, including ACORN, in order to radicalize Chicago's public schools.

Between 1969 and 1974, the Weather Underground claimed responsibility for some 20 bombings in the United States -- at police stations, banks, jails, courthouses, the Capitol and the Pentagon. Ayers became a fugitive in 1970, reports Andy McCarthy at the National Review, after three of his cohorts were "accidentally killed when the explosive they were building to Ayers' specifications -- Ayers was a bomb designer -- went off during construction."

The explosive, a nail bomb, "had been intended for detonation at a dance that was to be attended by army soldiers at Fort Dix, New Jersey," reports McCarthy. "Ayers attested that the bomb would have done serious damage, 'tearing through windows and walls and, yes, people too.'"

Ayers, describing the Weather Underground as "an American Red Army," motivated by "hope," succinctly summed up the organization's mission: "Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments."

"I don't regret setting bombs," Ayers told The New York Times in September 2001. "I feel we didn't do enough."

Ayers, in charge of shaping CAC's education philosophy, describes himself as "a radical, Leftist, small 'c' communist." Rather than focusing on anything as mundane as math or reading, the job of teachers, said Ayers, is to "teach against oppression."

Ayers "downplayed achievement tests in favor of activism," writes Stanley Kurtz, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

"Ayers wrote that teachers should be community organizers dedicated to provoking resistance to American racism and oppression," reports Kurtz. "He believes teacher education programs should serve as 'sites of resistance' to an oppressive system."

The question: Why do Obama's deeds contradict his words? Is anyone in the mainstream media curious?

Saturday, October 4, 2008

Palin Hits Obama on Ayers

At a fundraiser, here in this battle ground state, that concluded just minutes ago, Gov. Sarah Palin “takes of the gloves” and hits Senator Obama on his past association with 60’s militant Bill Ayers.

“Our opponent though is someone who sees America it seems as being so imperfect, imperfect enough that he’s palling around with terrorists who would target their own country. Americans need to know this.Talk about taking the gloves off, I too being that outsider and only being a part of this for 5 weeks now, I think ok we gotta get the word out.This is in fairness to the electorate we gotta start telling people what the other side represents.”

Way to go Sarah!  It's about time someone gotsome politically incorrect balls in Washington!

Commanding Alaska's Guard w/ 24/7 Missile Defense

Alaska is the first line of defense in our missile interceptor defense system. The 49th Missile Defense Battalion of the Alaska National Guard is the unit that protects the entire nation from ballistic missile attacks. It’s on permanent active duty, unlike other Guard units.

As governor of Alaska, Palin is briefed on highly classified military issues, homeland security, and counterterrorism. Her exposure to classified material may rival even Biden's.

She's also the commander in chief of the Alaska State Defense Force (ASDF), a federally recognized militia incorporated into Homeland Security's counterterrorism plans.

Palin is privy to military and intelligence secrets that are vital to the entire country's defense. Given Alaska's proximity to Russia, she may have security clearances we don't even know about.

According to the Washington Post, she first met with McCain in February, but nobody ever found out. This is a woman used to keeping secrets.

She can be entrusted with our national security, because she already is.


Commanding Alaska's Guard w/ 24/7 missile defense



Domains for SALE!

Make an offer:

barackopolis.com
barackopolis.net
iraqendgame.com
lookatberlin.com
looktoberlin.com
nbaoscars.com
nfloscars.com
nothingunderwear.net
nothingunderwear.com
reincarlinated.com
shimmertrees.com
shimmertrees.net
slowjoebiden.com
victoryrepublicans.com
victoryrepublicans.net

Contact stiruptheblog@yahoo.com

Biden's Lies, Ignored by Media

Biden's 14 Lies
Biden Lied About Supporting ‘Clean Coal’
Biden Lied About Obama Not Supporting Hamas Election
Biden’s Lebanon Nonsense
Biden’s Big Lie

Can They Catch Up? Of course.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/647fpfdp.asp

Can They Catch Up? 
Of course. 
by William Kristol

...one shouldn't underestimate the ideological issue, and the potency of the fact that Obama and Biden are orthodox liberals. They're for raising taxes, federally funding abortions, naming activist judges, and losing wars. The American people may think--they do think--the country's on the wrong track, that the Bush administration has made too many mistakes and that the Republican party's no great shakes. But they haven't suddenly become liberals. And they probably aren't crazy about the prospect of a liberal administration governing unchecked, hand in hand with a liberal Congress. During the next four weeks, the McCain-Palin campaign should make this risky prospect vivid.

Sunday, September 7, 2008

...on illegal immigration

I have been following this issue for some time, contacting my congressmen, etc. The fact is, illegal immigrants immeasurably burden American public funds and exploit our well-meaning policies designed to serve our own citizens. I appreciate the linked stats, but they are hardly relevant. The percentages and degree to which they exploit these policies is not the issue. It is against our law to be in our country without going through our immigration process. Period.

What to do about the border issue it is a delicate matter. But something MUST be done, and any mistakes dealt with as we go. To do nothing is essentially giving up US sovereignty. It should compel everyone to get involved.

The following is the latest correspondence I sent to Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, Sen. Barbara Boxer, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, and Gov Schwarzenegger:

 ---------------------------------------
August 14, 2008
Dear [recipient name was inserted here],

Lawmakers are constantly debating a series of proposals that address illegal immigration. This is not a simplistic issue. There is so much to consider, one hardly knows where to begin. 

As a human being, I sympathize with the unfortunate conditions from which Mexicans flee to the US. I feel for the people who were misled into thinking that if they could only make it across the border, they will be fine. I do not blame our southern neighbors for attempting to make better lives for themselves by coming to the US. We should blame ourselves for allowing our border integrity to be regarded as non-existent. We should blame ourselves for encouraging a larger number of illegal immigrants with such wonderful (free) incentives. 

As an American, I think we are obligated to uphold the law, which is based on standards, not emotion. US border policy should reflect what is best for American citizens, not for all people. Americans are the most compassionate, charitable people in the world. There are many private sector humanitarian efforts that aid the Mexican people IN Mexico.  

The fact that we have allowed so many illegal border crossings reveals our lack of integrity, and disrespect for our own laws. Why should they think differently? It is their job to break into the US, it is our job to stop and remove them. Illegal aliens within the US, it pains me to say, should be deported regardless of how well established they have become. They should get in line like everyone else. If a bank robber steals a million dollars, and the police catch him with the loot 5 years later, should he be allowed to keep the money? Even if it is [so they say] logistically infeasible to remove the untold millions, start doing it anyway! Once the word gets out that we have finally gotten serious about border enforcement, many considering the journey will change their minds.  Unfortunately, there are groups with our country who would have  illegal immigrants attain the vote in the US for selfish interests, which I think is tantamount to treason.

The borders have been inadequately enforced for so long, that I think we should reconsider the "anchor-baby" policy. Laxity in this area has created the distinct dilemma of having a LEGAL child, who is by law allowed to stay, being cared for by ILLEGAL parents, who is here illegally. So who gets to stay? A ‘compassionate’ policy that has not been fully thought through. It needs more thought and revision.

As it is now, we educate, medicate, feed and house illegal immigrants sending the message to all others that they are practically invited to come on in! Many fail to assimilate, they never learn English, they join gangs, they turn to crime, they spray paint our cities with graffiti, they exploit our public services, they drain school funds, they flood our emergency rooms as primary medical facilities, etc. So I don't think it is too much to ask, verifying legal status to qualify for school, driver's licenses, and Medicaid is not only prudent, it is imperative to the reduction of more illegal immigration, to say nothing of national security.  National Brain Drain is hardly discussed but who can gauge the long term effects (if any) to our infrastructure, economy, and the strength of the dollar? 

My girlfriend was born in Vietnam. She filed to come to the US legally in 1981. It took 11 YEARS of patient waiting before her application was approved. She then took the oath of US citizenship. Now, she is contributing to our progress with a successful software company, truly an asset to our economy. Where is the justice in making her wait so long when we turn a blind eye to criminals who have the advantage of sharing a porous border? How is this fair to law-biding immigrants? I pray we have the courage to do what is just and fair; to make and uphold policies that reward the law-abiding and not the law-breakers.

As a constituent of yours, I would like to know why you have not championed the sovereignty of our borders through any one the following Bills. Many of which are sound legislation and deserve debate and an up or down vote. I plead that you consider and support any or all of them.

Bill # S.2294 http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2294
Bill # S.2356 http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2356
Bill # S.2366 http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2366

Regards,
Jason Hoon

Creationism in Education...

Nice to meet you...


http://scienceblogs.com/authority/2008/08/quality_education_wins_again_i.php


Science is but a method by which we use to test and explain what we believe to be true about our physical world based on observable data.

So what happens when an observable truth does NOT hold up within the scientific model? (ie. we are still trying to fit quantum mechanics into this tiny little box), we simply dismiss or at best, postpone it, right? Now, I'm not saying science is a weak model, but it is incomplete at best. It seems to me the closed-minded ones here are the "Orthodox Scientists" who claim monopoly on the means to truth via the scientific method. That something is not scientifically testable, does not make it invalid. (ie. a bumble bee can still fly!) I am willing to bet no scientist suspends his belief when he observes one in flight. 

Yet, we are asked to suspend the belief of Creationism, which already has its inherent difficulties. Its daunting task is to explain the possibility that a single consciousness may be responsible for everything! Jeez, I say, cut them some slack. Afterall, Rome wasn't built in a day. 

I do not know all the details about this particular textbook and/or lawsuit. I am arguing in theory for all possible points of view being made. I propose we all drop the hubris about knowledge and truth; perhaps its alright to consider ALL possible points of view within the realm of education.  And perhaps knowledge is not the foundation we think it is.  What are we afraid of?

Conscience?